Overall Score
Cisco
73YES
25PARTIAL
2NO
98 of 100 answered checks supported
Palo Alto Networks
83YES
15PARTIAL
3NO
98 of 101 answered checks supported
BYOD Coverage
5/8vs8/8
Digital Experience Monitoring
8/8vs8/8
Ease of Deployment
6/10vs7/10
GenAI DLP
19/23vs19/23
Global PoP Coverage & SLA
2/8vs6/8
SD-WAN & Branch Office
10/10vs9/10
Threat Prevention
12/12vs12/12
TLS Inspection on Mobile
1/10vs2/10
ZTNA for Private Apps
10/12vs12/12
Detailed Comparison by Topic
Deciding between Cisco and Palo Alto Networks?
Get a custom report tailored to your specific requirements, deployment model, and compliance needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cisco or Palo Alto Networks better for SASE?
Based on 101 checks across 9 security topics, Palo Alto Networks leads with more fully supported capabilities. Cisco scored 73 YES answers while Palo Alto Networks scored 83. However, the best choice depends on your specific requirements — always evaluate against your deployment model and compliance needs.
Where does Cisco beat Palo Alto Networks?
Cisco outperforms Palo Alto Networks in 1 topic: SD-WAN & Branch Office. These results are based on publicly documented capabilities — specific findings are available in the detailed comparison tables above.
Where does Palo Alto Networks beat Cisco?
Palo Alto Networks outperforms Cisco in 5 topics: BYOD Coverage, Ease of Deployment, Global PoP Coverage & SLA, TLS Inspection on Mobile, ZTNA for Private Apps. These results are based on publicly documented capabilities — specific findings are available in the detailed comparison tables above.
Which is better for Global PoP Coverage & SLA: Cisco or Palo Alto Networks?
For Global PoP Coverage & SLA, Palo Alto Networks leads with 6 out of 8 capabilities fully supported, compared to 2 for the other. Check the detailed breakdown above for specific findings.
Which is better for BYOD Coverage: Cisco or Palo Alto Networks?
For BYOD Coverage, Palo Alto Networks leads with 8 out of 8 capabilities fully supported, compared to 5 for the other. Check the detailed breakdown above for specific findings.
Which is better for ZTNA for Private Apps: Cisco or Palo Alto Networks?
For ZTNA for Private Apps, Palo Alto Networks leads with 12 out of 12 capabilities fully supported, compared to 10 for the other. Check the detailed breakdown above for specific findings.
How is the Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks comparison conducted?
We test specific, granular scenarios across 9 security topics. All answers are sourced from publicly available vendor documentation, knowledge base articles, and verified user reports. YES means confirmed with documentation, PARTIAL means it works with limitations, NO means confirmed not supported. We are not affiliated with any vendor.
Other Cisco matchups
Other Palo Alto Networks matchups
Methodology
All answers are sourced from publicly available vendor documentation, knowledge base articles, press releases, and verified user reports. We do not rely on vendor marketing claims.
YES means the feature is confirmed working with documentation. PARTIAL means it works with significant caveats. NO means confirmed not supported. TBD means research is still in progress.