SASECompare
Home/Comparisons/ZTNA for Private Apps

ZTNA for Private Apps

LIVE

Can your SASE vendor replace your VPN for internal app access?

Zero Trust Network Access is the #1 reason enterprises adopt SASE. We tested 12 specific scenarios across 8 vendors to see who truly delivers identity-based, least-privilege access to private applications.

12checks
9vendors
Information sourced from publicly available documentation. Vendor capabilities change frequently. Always verify with the vendor before making purchasing decisions. Not affiliated with any vendor. See our terms & disclaimer. Vendors: to report inaccuracies, email [email protected].
Vendors (9/9)Click a card to toggle a vendor
YESSupported
PARTIALLimited
NONot supported
TBDResearch pending

Every answer is backed by public evidence. Click any result to read the finding and open its source links.

01

Agentless browser-based access to private apps?

02

Agent-based ZTNA for non-web apps (SSH, RDP, thick client)?

03

Device posture checks before granting access?

04

Integrates with major IdPs (Okta, Azure AD, Google)?

05

Per-app micro-segmentation (no network-level access)?

06

Continuous authorization / session re-evaluation?

07

Auto-discovery of private applications?

08

Split DNS for private app resolution?

09

Session recording for RDP/SSH?

10

Browser-based RDP/SSH without agent?

11

Connectors for AWS, Azure, GCP private apps?

12

Supports legacy protocols (VOIP, ICMP, SMB)?

Share
Did we get something wrong?Let us know

Need this analysis tailored to your environment?

Get a custom report with deeper analysis, weighted scoring based on your priorities, and vendor recommendations specific to your deployment.

Request Custom Report

Get notified when we publish new comparisons

No spam. Just new research drops and major updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which SASE vendor is best for ztna for private apps?
Based on 12 checks across 9 vendors, Palo Alto Networks leads with 12 of 12 researched capabilities fully supported (YES). Fortinet scored lowest with 8 YES answers. Results are based on publicly available documentation. Always verify with the vendor before purchasing.
Can the platform automatically discover internal applications across your network without manual configuration?
Cisco, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler fully support this. Cato Networks, Check Point, Cloudflare, Versa Networks offer partial support. Fortinet does not support this. Most enterprises don't know all their internal apps. Manual onboarding of hundreds of apps is unsustainable
Can privileged sessions (RDP, SSH) be recorded and audited for compliance and forensics?
Check Point, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler fully support this. Cisco, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Netskope, Versa Networks offer partial support. Cato Networks does not support this. Compliance frameworks (SOX, PCI) require audit trails for privileged access to production systems
Does ZTNA integrate with SAML/OIDC identity providers for authentication and group-based access policies?
Check Point, Cisco, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Versa Networks, Zscaler fully support this. Cato Networks offers partial support. ZTNA without IdP integration means managing a separate user directory - a non-starter for enterprises
Does the platform continuously re-evaluate risk during a session (not just at login) and revoke access if posture changes?
Cato Networks, Cisco, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler fully support this. Check Point, Versa Networks offer partial support. A device can be compromised mid-session. One-time auth at login isn't zero trust
Can the agent resolve internal DNS names without sending all DNS queries through the SASE tunnel?
Cato Networks, Check Point, Cisco, Cloudflare, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Versa Networks, Zscaler fully support this. Fortinet offers partial support. Users need to reach internal apps by hostname (e.g., jira.internal) without breaking public DNS resolution
How is the ZTNA for Private Apps comparison tested?
We test 12 specific scenarios across Cato Networks, Check Point, Cisco, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Versa Networks, Zscaler. All answers are sourced from publicly available vendor documentation, knowledge base articles, and verified user reports. YES means confirmed working with documentation, PARTIAL means it works with significant limitations, NO means confirmed not supported.

Methodology

All answers are sourced from publicly available vendor documentation, knowledge base articles, press releases, and verified user reports. We do not rely on vendor marketing claims.

YES means the feature is confirmed working with documentation. PARTIAL means it works with significant caveats or limitations. NO means it is confirmed not supported. TBD means research is still in progress.

Click any cell in the matrix to see the detailed evidence and source link.

Feedback

Help me make this better

This is a one-person project. Your input directly shapes what gets added, fixed, or prioritized next.